Blog Archives - Page 6 of 8 - Attorney Steven J. Topazio

Magistrate Hearing – Shoplifting Groceries – The Power of Restitution

In the realm of law, attorneys are often perceived as fierce advocates who fight tooth and nail to protect their clients. However, there are instances where the true power of legal representation lies not only in winning cases but also in finding compassionate solutions that address the underlying issues faced by their clients. Attorney Topazio recently managed to secure a favorable outcome for a client who had shoplifted groceries due to dire circumstances. The Case:In read More

Expunge Fraudulent Restraining Orders from your Record

In a recent case the court concluded that a judge has the inherent power to expunge the record of a civil abuse protection order, issued against a defendant pursuant to G. L. c. 209A, from the Statewide domestic violence registry system, in the rare and limited circumstance where the judge has found through clear and convincing evidence that the order was obtained through fraud on the court. In this case, Jake Jones and Amanda Adams read More

Embezzlement by Escrow Agents

In a recent case, the defendant, a building contractor, engaged through various business entities in the construction and improvement of residential homes. At the conclusion of a five-day trial, a Superior Court jury convicted each defendant of five counts of embezzlement of funds deposited with them by two customers, for the purpose of building a home. In accordance with purchase and sale agreements presented by the defendants for the construction of homes, the customers had read More

Stun guns no longer illegal in Massachusetts

Did you know that in Massachusetts stun guns are no longer illegal – Massachusetts courts concluded that stun guns are considered to be ‘arms’ and fall within the protection of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Furthermore, it was ruled that the absolute prohibition in G. L. c. 140, § 131J, barring all civilians from possessing or carrying stun guns, even in their own homes, was inconsistent with the Second Amendment and therefore read More

Embezzlement of Funds

In Massachusetts, embezzlement is a criminal offense involving stealing or misappropriating property that has been entrusted to someone for safekeeping. It is considered a type of theft crime and is punishable by law. Under Massachusetts law, embezzlement is defined as the fraudulent conversion of property or money by a person who has been entrusted with that property or money, for their own use or benefit. The crime of embezzlement can be committed by an employee, read More

When can a witness-spouse refuse to testify at trial?

If an argument between husband and wife escalates to one being charged with a crime or accused of domestic violence, the witness-spouse can later refuse to testify at trial. Under Massachusetts law, a witness-spouse has the right to exercise a marital privilege not to testify against their marital partner even if the prosecutor wants to prosecute the case and even without the witness-spouse’s testimony the criminal case might be dismissed due to lack of evidence. read More

Credit card fraud statute treats debit cards as credit cards.

Recently, a defendant argued that he couldn’t be convicted of credit card fraud for misusing a victim’s debit card, since proof of debit card misuse is not sufficient to support a conviction of fraudulent use of a credit card under G. L. c. 266, § 37C(e), because the instrument used was a “debit card” rather than a “credit card.” The defendant contended that because the debit card drew upon the victim’s own funds at the read More

When can a Police Officer Order you to Exit your Motor Vehicle after a traffic stop?

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that a police officer may order a driver of a motor vehicle to exit the vehicle during a traffic stop if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that the driver poses a threat to officer’s safety.   An exit order is a minimally intrusive intrusion on the driver’s liberty, and is justified by the need to protect the officer from harm. The court also emphasized that an exit order read More

Court Suppresses Firearm Discovered During An Investigatory Stop After It Finds Stop Was Based On A Hunch Rather Than Reasonable Suspicion Grounded In Specific, Articulable Facts And Reasonable Inferences Drawn Therefrom.

Commonwealth v. James Kearse, Docket # 18-P-1619 (2020) After observing the defendant, James Kearse, standing in the vicinity of two other men who engaged in a quick handshake, Brigido Leon, an officer in the Boston Police Department’s drug control unit (DCU), believed he had observed a hand-to-hand drug transaction.  Officer Leon radioed other officers to conduct an investigatory stop of the defendant and his companion.  As a result of this stop, the defendant was pat read More

The Exigent Circumstances Exception To The Search Warrant Requirement Is Inapplicable To Establish Probable Cause Where The Police Create The Exigency Themselves By Not Procuring A Search Warrant When It is Practical to Do So Before Going Into The Defendant’s Residence To Make A Warrantless Arrest

In the case of Commonwealth Vs. Jean Alexis, 481 Mass. 91 (2018) the SJC held that a Superior Court judge properly allowed the criminal defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence that police officers observed in plain view during a protective sweep of his dwelling after his warrantless arrest, where, under art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, the police could not avail themselves of the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement when it read More